RESUMO
Aims: Miscarriage and stillbirth have been included in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk guidelines, however heterogeneity in exposures and outcomes and the absence of reviews assessing induced abortion, prevented comprehensive assessment. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of cardiovascular diseases for women with prior pregnancy loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, and induced abortion). Methods and results: Observational studies reporting risk of CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke in women with pregnancy loss were selected after searching MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library (to January 2020). Data were extracted, and study quality were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using inverse variance weighted random-effects meta-analysis.Twenty-two studies involving 4 337 683 women were identified. Seven studies were good quality, seven were fair and eight were poor. Recurrent miscarriage was associated with a higher CHD risk (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.12-1.66). One or more stillbirths was associated with a higher CVD (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.09-1.82), CHD (RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.04-1.29), and stroke risk (RR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.03-1.71). Recurrent stillbirth was associated with a higher CHD risk (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.18-1.39). One or more abortions was associated with a higher CVD (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07), as was recurrent abortion (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.13). Conclusion: Women with previous pregnancy loss are at a higher CVD, CHD, and stroke risk. Early identification and risk factor management is recommended. Further research is needed to understand CVD risk after abortion.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The beta-lactam antibiotic amoxicillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid in combination with amoxicillin are known to cause both immediate- and nonimmediate-type hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize a large cohort of patients with a history of amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid hypersensitivity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the demographics, presentation, investigation, and management of 331 patients presenting to 1 allergy center with a history of hypersensitivity to amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. RESULTS: Hypersensitivity was confirmed in 37 of 221 patients (17%) who took amoxicillin and 47 of 110 patients (43%) who took amoxicillin-clavulanic acid as the index drug. In immediate hypersensitivity, skin test results confirmed the diagnosis in 66 of 139 patients (47%). Penicillin cross-reactivity was observed in 16 of 36 patients (44%). Of the 16 patients who were cross-reactive, 13 (81%) reacted to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid as the index drug. All patients who had negative skin test results (73/139) underwent drug provocation. The negative predictive value of skin tests was 89%. In nonimmediate hypersensitivity, delayed intradermal tests confirmed diagnosis in 12 of 170 patients (7%). Of the 12 patients whose skin test results were positive, 8 (67%) presented with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. All patients with a negative skin test result (158/170) underwent drug provocation. The negative predictive value of skin tests was 95%. Penicillin cross-reactivity was observed in 3 of 12 patients (25%). Ten patients were diagnosed with hypersensitivity to clavulanic acid. CONCLUSION: The negative predictive value of skin tests in both immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions is excellent and excludes severe allergy. Nonimmediate hypersensitivity is rare. Confirmed hypersensitivity is more likely if amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is the index drug. Cross-reactivity was more common in patients presenting with immediate hypersensitivity, typically involving benzylpenicillin. A minority of patients were allergic to clavulanic acid.
